SW Critical Path & Dependent Failure Analysis
Find the software paths that can violate safety goals, rate component criticality, break dependent failure couplings - and spend verification effort where it changes the outcome.
- Chapters
- 7
- Chapters
- Worked examples
- 2
- Worked examples
- Analysis templates
- 4
- Analysis templates
- Coupling factor classes
- 6
- Coupling factor classes
- 01Overview
- 02Critical Path Analysis
- 03Dependent Failure Analysis
- 04Methodology
- 05Templates & Tools
Why it pays for itself
Verification effort where it matters
Rating components on the C1 to C4 criticality scale lets you concentrate reviews, testing, and safety mechanisms on the paths that can violate safety goals - instead of spreading effort evenly across code that cannot.
Common causes made visible
Six coupling factor classes systematically expose the shared power rails, buses, development teams, and compilers that quietly defeat your redundancy - before a single common cause takes out both channels.
Templates, not blank pages
A component criticality matrix, signal classification template, coupling factor and failure mode assessment templates, and CPA and DFA checklists mean your first analysis starts from structure, not from an empty spreadsheet.
What you’ll be able to do
Trace critical paths end to end
Follow safety-related signals from input through controllers to actuator outputs and name every path that can violate a safety goal.
Rate components C1 to C4
Classify software components from non-safety to safety-critical and use the rating to prioritize reviews and testing.
Find coupling factors early
Apply the six coupling factor classes to expose shared power, buses, teams, and toolchains that quietly defeat redundancy.
Plan analysis effort and timing
Schedule CPA and DFA at the right project phase with a realistic effort distribution and measurable quality metrics.
Justify mechanism placement
Put safety mechanisms on rated critical paths with documented rationale instead of scattering defenses by intuition.
Chapter by chapter
- 01
Overview
Understand why critical path analysis and dependent failure analysis exist: tracing safety-related inputs through processing to safety-critical outputs, and what that buys your verification planning.
- Input-to-output tracing
- Why CPA + DFA
- 02
Critical Path Analysis
Run CPA step by step: identify critical software features, safety-important interfaces, and safety-significant signals, then rate components on the C1 to C4 criticality scale and place safety mechanisms.
- Step-by-step process
- C1-C4 criticality
- Signal classification
- 03
Dependent Failure Analysis
Hunt common causes with DFA: six coupling factor classes - shared resources, shared inputs, systematic coupling, identical components, communication, and unintended interfaces - and the analysis process around them.
- 6 coupling classes
- DFA process
- 04
Methodology
Plan the work: analysis timelines and effort distribution across project weeks, quality metrics for both analyses, and when in the project to perform CPA and DFA.
- Effort distribution
- Quality metrics
- When to analyze
- 05
Templates & Tools
Work from ready structures: component criticality matrix, signal classification template, coupling factor and failure mode assessment templates, recommended tooling, and CPA and DFA checklists.
- Criticality matrix
- CPA & DFA checklists
- 06
Examples
See both analyses on real architectures: three critical paths through a steer-by-wire system, coupling factors in a brake-by-wire design, and before-and-after analysis results.
- Steer-by-wire CPA
- Brake-by-wire DFA
- 07
Best Practices
Adopt what works: planning and execution practices, common pitfalls to avoid, ISO 26262 and ASIL-driven requirements on the analyses, and KPIs for analysis quality and efficiency.
- Common pitfalls
- ISO 26262 compliance
- Analysis KPIs
Steer-by-wire critical paths and brake-by-wire coupling factors
Two worked systems show the analyses end to end - identifying critical paths in a steer-by-wire architecture, then dependent failure couplings in a brake-by-wire design.
- Path 1, normal operation: input through the primary controller to motor and feedback
- Path 2, failure detection: monitor to fault detection to safe state
- Path 3, fallback operation: secondary controller with manual override
- Brake-by-wire couplings: shared 12 V power rail, shared CAN bus, same development team, shared compiler
- Before-and-after comparison of analysis results with mitigation strategies
Unlock in course
Who this guide is for
- Software architects who must show independence between components of different ASILs
- Verification leads deciding where review and test budget actually buys risk reduction
- Safety engineers performing dependent failure analysis on redundant architectures
- Developers of fail-operational systems such as brake-by-wire and steer-by-wire
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SW Critical Path & Dependent Failure Analysis
Start the course today
A free account unlocks one full concept guide, 3 work product templates, 1 guided process, the Markov simulator, and 5 practice exams per month. The Pro and Expert plans unlock more of the 77-guide library. No credit card required.