Train your whole safety team on one annual contract.
Every seat carries the full Expert plan, all content, simulators and exams, with team admin, assigned exams and analytics on top. Set your team size to see the rate.
Seats belong to the company and are reassignable at any time at no cost: when an engineer moves on, the seat goes to the next hire.
Seat rates are net, VAT excluded, on a one year minimum term billed annually. Individual plans are compared at their final monthly price.
Assign. Track. Prove.
What a team seat adds to the Expert plan, for the person who runs training.
Assign
Assign an exam once, with a due date, to one engineer or the whole organization. Automated reminders and recurring yearly refreshers run on their own.
Assigned exams with due dates, plus personal self paced learning
Role based curricula and tracked assigned coursework
Track
Team dashboard visibility for admins: who has passed, who is in progress and who has not started, with team and question level analytics.
Scheduled manager reports on progress, gaps and overdue work
Audit logged administration
Prove
Every exam attempt is a recorded result. Each member keeps a training record with certificates, and the competence matrix exports as competence evidence per engineer.
Seat reassignment: swap an engineer out, the seat keeps working
Archived members can be reactivated at any time, with their progress, scores and evidence intact
What the admin sees
The real team workspace, screen by screen and at its true proportions: who is behind, what is assigned, where the competence gaps are, and the records you hand to an assessor.
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Organization overviewExam activity 05.08.2026 to 03.11.2026
19Completed attempts
8Participants
78.5Average score
63%Pass rate
3 months
DashboardAbout this tab
Exam activity for the whole team in one window: attempts, participants, average score and pass rate.
One window on the whole team: completed attempts, participants, average score and pass rate for the period you pick, a score per engineer, and a member table that shows at a glance who has not attempted anything yet.
You can
Switch the window between 30 days, 3 months, a year or your own dates
Spot the engineers below the pass mark before an audit does
Further down the same dashboard, one card per area of the workspace: safety case progress and overdue items, curriculum completion, Expert Desk hours, competence gaps against your role requirements, and onboarding plans.
You can
See overdue safety case items across every project
Track how far each assigned curriculum has got
Watch the consultancy hours left in your plan
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Team statisticsEngagement and exam results per member
37h 46mConcept read time
10h 42mVideo watch time
11Exams completed
9Active members
30d
StatisticsAbout this tab
Engagement analytics over a 7, 30 or 90 day window: reading time, video time, exam results, per member.
Read more
Daily engagement
Learning time per day, last 30 days
Concept readVideo watch
Engagement by member
10 members
Ravi Iyer
Tomás Novak
Lena Chen
Ana Santos
Jonas Wagner
Daniel Okafor
Sofia Brandt
Mara Keller
Radu Dinu
Petra Lindner
0m2h 30m5h7h 30m10h
Concept readVideo watch
Exam results by member
Average score and pass rate, organization-wide
Ravi Iyer
Daniel Okafor
Mara Keller
Tomás Novak
Lena Chen
Jonas Wagner
Sofia Brandt
Ana Santos
0255075100
Pass rateAvg score
Statistics
Engagement over a 7, 30 or 90 day window: daily reading and video time for the team, learning time per member, and average score next to pass rate for every engineer. Only learning on content you assigned counts, so it is time spent on your programme, not on private study.
You can
See which days and weeks the team actually learns
Compare reading and video time member by member
Sort the member detail table by any column
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Team membersInvite people in any role and change anyone’s role from the Role column.
10Members
10Active
0Archived
0Invitations
MembersAbout this tab
Invite or import the roster, manage roles and groups, scope administrators, pair mentors and archive leavers.
Read more
Invite a member
They receive an email invitation to join this organization.
Projects, departments and business units are the same thing with a different label, so somebody can be in two at once. Tag members here and the roster, the competence matrix, the gap analysis, the cohort report and the register export can all be sliced by any of them.
Project nameBrake-by-Wire (ASIL D)
Code (optional)BBW
TypeProject
Cost centre (optional)CC-4720
Add group
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)EPSProjectCC-47115 membersEdit team
Battery Management SystemBMSProjectNo cost centre4 membersEdit team
Functional Safety OfficeFSODepartmentCC-21003 membersEdit team
Administrator scope
Restrict an administrator to named groups, so the hardware safety lead administers the hardware programme and not the others. An administrator with no restriction keeps full authority over the whole organisation - that is the default and nothing changes until you set one here. Only you, the account owner, can change this.
Jonas WagnerFull organisationRestrict
Mentors
A mentor (any seat-holding member) gets read access to exactly their mentees’ competence profile and training transcript, without any admin rights.
MentorSelect a mentor
MenteeSelect a mentee
Create pair
Jonas WagnermentorsAna Santossince 03.11.2026Revoke
Mara KellermentorsSofia Brandtsince 14.10.2026Revoke
Daniel OkaformentorsLena Chensince 02.09.2026Revoke
Invite, groups and scope
Bring people in by email or a CSV import, in any of five roles. Tag them with the projects, departments and business units you already work in, so every report and the competence matrix can be sliced the same way, and limit an administrator to the groups they actually run.
You can
Invite one engineer or import the whole team from a CSV
Group people by project, department or business unit
Restrict an admin to named groups and pair mentors with mentees
Mentors
A mentor (any seat-holding member) gets read access to exactly their mentees’ competence profile and training transcript, without any admin rights.
MentorSelect a mentor
MenteeSelect a mentee
Create pair
Jonas WagnermentorsAna Santossince 03.11.2026Revoke
Mara KellermentorsSofia Brandtsince 14.10.2026Revoke
Daniel OkaformentorsLena Chensince 02.09.2026Revoke
Seat composition
8 committed seats of 10 on the advanced plan. Every seat carries the organization plan tier - there is no per-seat tier and no mixed roster.
8 x advanced
Every seat carries the organisation's plan tier - B2B is offered on the Expert plan only, and there is no per-seat tier. Seats are priced per seat from this organisation's negotiated billing terms, which must agree with the published volume band for the contracted seat count.
Active 10Archived 0Search by name or email...All rolesAll groups10 members
Every person in one roster: their org role (Owner, Admin, Billing admin, Member or Viewer), the professional role the competence matrix measures them against, their groups and their status. Archiving a leaver frees the seat for the next engineer and keeps their record.
You can
Change a role or professional role straight from the table
Let an admin also manage billing with one tick
Archive a leaver and reuse the seat, record intact
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Exam libraryAssign from your org exam library. Assignments only ever ADD access, never remove it.
3Own exams
4Templates
7Assignable
4Assignments
ExamsAbout this tab
The org exam library plus exam assignments: due dates, email reminders, attempt policy, and revocation.
Read more
Assign an exam
Assignees are notified by email automatically - an assignment email goes out right away, and any reminders you add below are emailed on schedule.
Exam (from the library)Annual Functional Safety Refresher (org exam)
Due date & time (optional)30.11.2026, 17:00
Assign to
Entire organizationSpecific member
Email reminders (optional, max 10)Add reminder
No reminders - assignees still get the assignment email immediately.
Policy (optional)
Policy only tightens the platform rules: the pass mark can be raised (never lowered), attempts and cool-down count per qualification cycle.
Pass mark override (1-100)80
Max attempts per cycle (1-20)3
Retake cool-down (hours, 1-2160)24
Repeat every N months (1-60)12
Assign to organization
Assignments
Assignees are notified by email automatically; reminders (if any) are emailed on schedule. Revoking stops assignment-based access and any not-yet-sent reminder emails.
Search by exam or member...Active4 assignments
Exam
Assigned to
Status
Due
Reminders
Created
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
Pass mark 80%Max 3 attempts19 attempts, best 94%
Entire organization
assigned
17.11.2026, 19:00
2
03.11.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
Pass mark 85%Max 2 attempts1 attempt, best 68%
Ana Santos
started
24.11.2026, 17:00
1
28.10.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Assign an exam
Assign a qualification exam to the whole organization or to one engineer, with a due date and the email reminders you choose. The policy can only tighten the platform rules: raise the pass mark, cap attempts per cycle, set a retake cool-down and repeat the exam every N months for yearly refreshers.
You can
Assign to everyone or one engineer, with a due date
Raise the pass mark and cap attempts per cycle
Repeat the exam every 12 months without lifting a finger
Assignments
Assignees are notified by email automatically; reminders (if any) are emailed on schedule. Revoking stops assignment-based access and any not-yet-sent reminder emails.
Search by exam or member...Active4 assignments
Exam
Assigned to
Status
Due
Reminders
Created
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
Pass mark 80%Max 3 attempts19 attempts, best 94%
Entire organization
assigned
17.11.2026, 19:00
2
03.11.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
Pass mark 85%Max 2 attempts1 attempt, best 68%
Ana Santos
started
24.11.2026, 17:00
1
28.10.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Annual Functional Safety Refresher
Pass mark 80%Repeats every 12moCycle 2
Entire organization
assigned
30.11.2026, 17:00
3
01.10.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Software Safety Requirements Quiz
Max 3 attempts2 attempts, best 91%
Ravi Iyer
assigned
12.12.2026, 12:00
-
20.10.2026
EvidenceRevoke
Our exams
Built by your organization from the released question bank. Archiving keeps completed attempts but stops new assignments and starts.
Exam
Status
Questions
Points
Duration
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
Baseline qualification for engineers joining a safety project: item definition, ASIL...
published
10
23
45 min
AssignArchive
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
Situation analysis, hazard identification and S/E/C rating on two worked items...
published
12
30
40 min
AssignArchive
Annual Functional Safety Refresher
The yearly refresher for every seat: lifecycle, confirmation measures, changes since...
published
15
32
30 min
AssignArchive
Template exams
Ready-made exams curated by the platform. Assignability is bounded by your organization's plan - templates outside the plan are rejected at assignment time.
Exam
Questions
Points
Duration
Functional Safety Foundations
plan-bounded template
20
40
40 min
Assign
Safety Analyses: FMEA, FTA and DFA
plan-bounded template
24
52
50 min
Assign
Software Safety (Part 6) Essentials
plan-bounded template
18
36
35 min
Assign
Hardware Metrics: SPFM, LFM and PMHF
plan-bounded template
16
38
45 min
Assign
Assignments and exam library
Every assignment in one list with its policy, target, status, due date and reminders, and the evidence behind it one click away. Below sit the exams your organization built from the released question bank and the ready-made templates your plan includes.
You can
See attempts and best score per assignment at a glance
Open the evidence record or revoke an assignment
Assign your own exams or platform templates
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Create an organization examCompose an org-only exam from the released question bank. Answer keys stay hidden.
ExamsAbout this tab
The org exam library plus exam assignments: due dates, email reminders, attempt policy, and revocation.
Read more
SettingsQuestionsReview
Title *Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
DescriptionSituation analysis, hazard identification and S/E/C rating on two worked items: an electric power steering column lock and a battery contactor. Checks that the engineer can defend an ASIL, not just recall the table.
Instructions (shown to members before starting)You have 40 minutes and one sitting. Use the item definitions provided in each scenario; do not assume extra safety mechanisms. Partial credit applies to multi-select questions.
Duration (minutes, 1-600; empty = untimed)40
Max attempts (1-100)2
Passing score (%, 0-100; empty = none)85
Randomize question order
Next: pick questions
Exam builder
Build an exam that is yours alone from the released question bank, in three steps: settings, questions, review. You set the duration, attempt limit and pass mark; the answer keys stay hidden from everyone in your organization, admins included.
You can
Write your own title, description and candidate instructions
Pick questions by part, topic and difficulty
Randomize the order so no two sittings look alike
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
CurriculaRole-based learning paths of ordered concept reads, simulators and exams.
CurriculaAbout this tab
Ordered learning paths, assignable to a member, professional role, project team or the whole organization.
Read more
Assign to a project team
Assign one learning path to everybody tagged with a project - the same programmes the competence report and the register already slice by.
ProjectElectric Power Steering (ASIL D)
Learning pathAcme Safety Systems Safety Analysis Expert Track
Due date (optional)15.12.2026
Assign to the project team
Catalog
Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials
Functional Safety Manager~215 min total3 assignments
Assign
Part 2 and Part 8 duties for the safety manager: planning, confirmation measures, distributed development (DIA/SEooC), change control and the lifecycle beyond development.
1Safety Plan Development35 min
2Confirmation Measures20 min
3Development Interface Agreement30 min
4Safety Element out of Context (SEooC)25 min
5Change Impact Analysis for Carryover and Modified Systems30 min
6Production, Operation, Service and Decommissioning30 min
7ISO 26262 vs Other Safety Standards45 min
Acme Safety Systems Safety Analysis Expert Track
Safety Analysis Expert~355 min total2 assignments
Assign
The full Part 9 analysis toolbox in depth: comparative overview, FMEA, FTA, dependent failures, guide-word analysis and state-based modeling.
1Safety Analyses30 min
2FMEA Mastery for Functional Safety60 min
3Fault Tree Analysis Mastery60 min
4Dependent Failure Analysis (DFA)30 min
5Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)60 min
6HAZOP: Guide-Word Deviation Analysis60 min
7Markov Chains Analysis55 min
Curricula
Role-based learning paths: ordered concept reads, simulators and exams with a time estimate per step. Start from a platform template, clone it into your organization and edit it, then assign it to one engineer, a professional role, a project team or everyone.
You can
Clone a platform path and make it your own
Assign a path to a project team in one step
Follow progress per assignment, with a due date
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
PlacementOne diagnostic exam maps a new member's gaps and proposes a curriculum.
CurriculaAbout this tab
Ordered learning paths, assignable to a member, professional role, project team or the whole organization.
Read more
Curricula
Placement exam
Pick the exam that serves as the day-1 diagnostic. It must be one of your own org exams or a platform template, and members take it like any assigned exam.
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification (org exam)Update placement exam
Current: ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
Invite and analyze
Select a memberAssign placement examAnalyze newest attempt
Proposals to review
Lena Chen
Attempt 71906e9f, analyzed 03.11.2026, 19:00:34
Confirm and assignDismiss
Hazard Analysis & Risk Ass...1/2gap
Technical Safety Concept ...1/2gap
Software Development3/3strong
Safety Analyses1/1too few questions
examHazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Checkfrom area crosswalk30 minRemove
Tomás Novak
Attempt 02ab8cf3, analyzed 03.11.2026, 19:00:34
Confirm and assignDismiss
Hazard Analysis & Risk Ass...1/2gap
Technical Safety Concept ...1/2gap
Software Development2/3developing
Safety Analyses1/1too few questions
examHazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Checkfrom area crosswalk30 minRemove
Placement
A day-one diagnostic for every new engineer. One placement exam maps their score per competency area, marks each area strong, developing or a gap, and proposes exactly the learning that closes the gaps. You confirm the proposal or dismiss it.
You can
Send a new hire the placement exam on day one
See their gaps per area before they start on a project
Confirm the proposed learning, skip what they already know
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
CourseworkAssign concept pages and templates as trackable reading, with due dates.
CourseworkAbout this tab
Trackable concept or work-product reading for a member, project team or the whole organization.
Read more
Assign to a project team
Assign one reading item to everybody tagged with a project - the same programmes the competence report and the register already slice by.
ProjectBattery Management System
Reading itemDependent Failure Analysis (DFA)
Due date (optional)18.12.2026
Assign to the project team
Assigned reading
Assign
Search titles...All statusesAll kinds6 of 6
Actuator Safety
Whole organizationDue 06.11.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
70%
active
AI Component or System Architecture (Refined)
Ana SantosDue 06.11.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
0%
active
Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment (HARA)
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)Due 20.11.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
60%
active
Freedom from Interference (FFI)
Ravi IyerDue 27.11.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
100%
completed
Hardware Architectural Metrics Report
Battery Management SystemDue 04.12.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
25%
active
Confirmation Measures
Sofia BrandtDue 28.10.2026Assigned by Mara Keller
30%
overdue
Coursework
Single pieces of assigned reading: a concept page or a work-product template, for one engineer, a project team or the whole organization, each with a due date and a progress bar that fills as they actually read.
You can
Assign one concept or template with a due date
Send reading to everyone on a project at once
See who has read it and who has not started
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Competence MatrixPersonnel competence evidence per ISO 26262 role and competency area
10Members
6ASIL areas of 7
14Strong cells
1Gap cells
CompetenceAbout this tab
Personnel competence evidence against your role and competency taxonomy, backed by exams and certificates.
Read more
All membersAll rolesAll areas 7ASIL-relevant only 6
Member
Safety Management
Part 2
Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment
Part 3ASIL
Functional Safety Concept
Part 3ASIL
Technical Safety Concept & System
Part 4ASIL
Hardware Design & Metrics
Part 5ASIL
Software Development
Part 6ASIL
Safety Analyses
Part 9ASIL
Ana SantosHardware Safety Engineer
-
68%
-
-
84%
-
71%
Daniel OkaforFunctional Safety Manager
88%
91%
91%
86%
-
-
74%
Jonas WagnerSafety Engineer
72%
70%
82%
70%
-
-
64%
Lena ChenVerification Engineer
-
78%
78%
85%
-
73%
-
Mara KellerFunctional Safety Manager
92%
88%
76%
76%
-
-
-
Petra LindnerNo role assigned
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radu DinuNo role assigned
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ravi IyerSoftware Safety Engineer
-
91%
91%
91%
-
94%
72%
Sofia BrandtProject Manager
70%
70%
70%
-
-
-
-
Tomás NovakSafety Analysis Expert
-
78%
78%
78%
54%
-
87%
Competence matrix
Every engineer against every ISO 26262 competency area, each cell backed by exam results and certificates with a validity date. Strong, developing, gap or no signal at a glance, with an orange ring where evidence is about to expire, and the whole matrix exports as competence evidence for an assessor.
You can
Filter by member, professional role or ASIL-relevant areas
Spot expiring evidence before it lapses
Open any cell to see the evidence behind it
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Gap AnalysisRequired competence per role versus each member's evidence
7Roles evaluated
8Members evaluated
4With shortfalls
4Total shortfalls
CompetenceAbout this tab
Personnel competence evidence against your role and competency taxonomy, backed by exams and certificates.
Hardware Design & MetricsrequiredDevelopingactualNo signal
Competence gaps
For every professional role, the competence you require and, per engineer, exactly where they fall short: the area, the level you asked for and the level their evidence shows today. The answer to "who is not qualified for this role yet, and in what" is one page, not a spreadsheet.
You can
Set the required level per role and area once
See every shortfall per engineer, required against actual
Slice the analysis by member or project group
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Daniel OkaforFunctional Safety Manager - [email protected] - joined 12.03.2025
CompetenceAbout this tab
Personnel competence evidence against your role and competency taxonomy, backed by exams and certificates.
Read more
StrongDevelopingGapNo signalExpiring within 6 months
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification91%21.10.2026Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check92%28.10.2026
Functional Safety Concept
Part 3ASIL
91%
Valid until 21.10.2028
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification91%21.10.2026
Technical Safety Concept & System
Part 4ASIL
86%
Valid until 21.10.2028
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification86%21.10.2026
Hardware Design & Metrics
Part 5ASIL
-
No evidence yet.
Software Development
Part 6ASIL
-
No evidence yet.
Safety Analyses
Part 9ASIL
74%
Valid until 02.09.2028
Safety Analyses: FMEA, FTA and DFA74%02.09.2026
Engineer competence profile
One engineer, every competency area: the status, the evidence behind it and how long that evidence stays valid. Exam results and certificates are linked as proof, and evidence that expires within six months is flagged, so a renewal is planned instead of discovered.
You can
See the proof behind every rating for one engineer
Catch evidence that is about to expire
Open their AI evaluation or full training record
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Competence taxonomyYour organization's professional roles, competency areas and required levels
7Roles
7Competency areas
21Required levels
0Yours
CompetenceAbout this tab
Personnel competence evidence against your role and competency taxonomy, backed by exams and certificates.
Read more
Professional roles
The job titles your competence matrix is organised by. A member holds one. Renaming changes the label only - the key stays fixed, because it is what every member role, curriculum and requirement points at.
The columns of the competence matrix. Each one decides which exam evidence counts towards it, what score reads as Developing or Strong, and how long that evidence stays valid.
Add an area
Safety ManagementPlatform default
safety-management · Strong from 80%, Developing from 60% · valid 24 months · ISO parts 2, 8
Competence taxonomy
The rules behind the matrix are yours to set. Keep the platform's seven professional roles and seven ISO 26262 competency areas or add your own, decide the level each role requires per area, the scores that count as Developing or Strong, and how long evidence stays valid.
You can
Add the job titles your organization actually uses
Set the required level per role and area
Tune the score thresholds and evidence validity
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Safety Case TrackerTrack work-product coverage and completion for each project's safety case.
Safety CaseAbout this tab
Per-project work-product coverage with GSN arguments, snapshots and printable reports.
Read more
Active2Archived1All3
Battery Management System
BMS
Coverage31%
9 items1 past target
EditArchiveDelete
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)
EPS
Coverage45%
15 items2 past target
EditArchiveDelete
Electric Parking Brake (pilot)
EPBArchived
Coverage100%
11 items
EditRestoreDelete
Safety case projects
One card per vehicle project: the share of its work products that is complete, how many items it tracks and how many have slipped past their target date. Finished programmes are archived read-only, so the record stays and the list stays short.
You can
Open a project to its tracker, argument, snapshots and report
See slipped work products on every project at a glance
Archive a finished programme and restore it when it comes back
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)EPS - Safety case tracker
45%Coverage
15Tracked items
3/15Approved
Safety CaseAbout this tab
Per-project work-product coverage with GSN arguments, snapshots and printable reports.
Read more
All trackersTrackerGSN argumentSnapshotsReport
Library
Templates234ISO catalog131
Search library...All partsAll phases
Add places an entry: At the top levelClick a section in the tracker to add into it.
Item Definition
added
Part 3§ 5.5.1Concept
Add
Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment Report
added
Part 3§ 6.5.1Concept Phase
Add
Functional Safety Concept
added
Part 3§ 7.5.1Concept
Add
Verification report of the functional safety concept
Part 3§ 7.5.2Concept
Add
Technical Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 4§ 6.5.1System Development
Add
Technical Safety Concept
added
Part 4§ 6.5.2System Development
Add
Hardware-Software Interface Specification (HSI)
added
Part 4§ 6.5.4System Development
Add
System Architectural Design Specification
Part 4§ 6.5.3System Development
Add
Safety Validation Specification
Part 4§ 8.5.1Safety Validation
Add
Hardware Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 5§ 6.5.1Product Development
Add
FMEDA Worksheet (Board-level)
Part 5§ 8.5.1Hardware Development
Add
Software Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 6§ 6.5.1Software Development
Add
Search title, ISO clause, notes...Any statusAnyoneOverdueAwaiting review(2)
The work products of one project as a tree of lifecycle sections, each with its status, completeness, owner, target date and review sign-off. Drag templates in from the library of 234 work-product templates, or from the ISO catalog, and the row links straight to the deliverable.
You can
Filter by status, owner, overdue or awaiting review
Drag work products in from the template library
Export the tracker or manage who may view and edit it
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)EPS - Safety case tracker
45%Coverage
15Tracked items
3/15Approved
Safety CaseAbout this tab
Per-project work-product coverage with GSN arguments, snapshots and printable reports.
Read more
All trackersTrackerGSN argumentSnapshotsReport
Library
Templates234ISO catalog131
Search library...All partsAll phases
Add places an entry: At the top levelClick a section in the tracker to add into it.
Item Definition
added
Part 3§ 5.5.1Concept
Add
Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment Report
added
Part 3§ 6.5.1Concept Phase
Add
Functional Safety Concept
added
Part 3§ 7.5.1Concept
Add
Verification report of the functional safety concept
Part 3§ 7.5.2Concept
Add
Technical Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 4§ 6.5.1System Development
Add
Technical Safety Concept
added
Part 4§ 6.5.2System Development
Add
Hardware-Software Interface Specification (HSI)
added
Part 4§ 6.5.4System Development
Add
System Architectural Design Specification
Part 4§ 6.5.3System Development
Add
Safety Validation Specification
Part 4§ 8.5.1Safety Validation
Add
Hardware Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 5§ 6.5.1Product Development
Add
FMEDA Worksheet (Board-level)
Part 5§ 8.5.1Hardware Development
Add
Software Safety Requirements Specification
added
Part 6§ 6.5.1Software Development
Add
Search title, ISO clause, notes...Any statusAnyoneOverdueAwaiting review(2)
NotesUnder review with the assessor. Method selection per ASIL is the open point.
71/5000
Template
The deliverable this row stands for. Link it and the team can open and download the template straight from the tracker.
Verification Plan (Part 8)
Supporting Processes · v1.0.2
Open templateChangeRemove
Review
Approved by Mara Keller
02.11.2026, 16:42:10
Verification methods per ASIL D agree with Part 8 Table 2. Approved for the assessor round.
Withdraw decision
Note for the author (optional)
ApproveRequest changesThe status stays as it is.
ISO part
8 §9.5.1
Created
08.09.2026
Updated
02.11.2026
Review sign-off
Every work product opens into one panel: status, completeness, owner, target date, notes, the linked template and the review decision with its date and note. A decision on an item that changed afterwards is flagged as out of date, so an approval always refers to what was actually reviewed.
You can
Approve or request changes with a note for the author
Rely on the independence check: no one signs off their own work
Link the template behind each deliverable and open it in one click
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)EPS - Safety case tracker
45%Coverage
15Tracked items
3/15Approved
Safety CaseAbout this tab
Per-project work-product coverage with GSN arguments, snapshots and printable reports.
A1The driver holds the wheel within the agreed hand-over timeA
G2Concept-phase hazards are identified and mitigated
G3Hardware and software faults are controlled
Sn1HARA Report
Complete 100%
Sn2Functional Safety Concept
In progress 60%
100%
Solution
TypeSolution
IdentifierSn2
StatementFunctional Safety Concept
Evidence
Functional Safety Concept
In progress, 60% complete
Open in trackerChangeUnlink
Shown status
In progressStatus follows evidence
Manual status (used when no evidence is linked)In progress
NotesSafety goals SG1 to SG3 allocated. Degradation strategy for the assist torque still needs the agreed hand-over time.
GSN safety argument
The safety argument drawn in Goal Structuring Notation next to the tracker it argues over: goals, strategies, solutions, context, assumptions and justifications. A solution linked to a tracked work product takes its status from that evidence, so the argument turns green only as the deliverables are actually completed.
You can
Link each solution to the work product that is its evidence
Check the argument for undeveloped goals and loose ends
Download the diagram as SVG or PNG for the safety case report
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Safety case reportElectric Power Steering (ASIL D) (EPS)
Safety CaseAbout this tab
Per-project work-product coverage with GSN arguments, snapshots and printable reports.
Read more
All trackersTrackerGSN argumentSnapshotsReport
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)
Project code EPS - Active
Generated 03.11.2026, 19:26:06
45%
overall completeness (15 tracked items)
Argument (GSN)
SVGPNG
G1The item is acceptably safe for series release
C1Operational design domain and item definition
S1Argument over the ISO 26262 lifecycle phases
A1The driver holds the wheel within the agreed hand-over timeA
G2Concept-phase hazards are identified and mitigated
G3Hardware and software faults are controlled
Sn1HARA Report
Complete 100%
Sn2Functional Safety Concept
In progress 60%
100%
Work products
Concept phaseSection
Item DefinitionComplete3 5.5.1Owner: Ravi IyerDue 04.09.2026100%
Baseline released with the vehicle programme. Steering column interface and the ODD boundary agreed with the OEM.
ASIL D decomposed to ASIL B(D) plus ASIL B(D) across the motor control and the independent monitor.
Confluence: TSC working page
System Safety AnalysisIn progress4 6.5.7Owner: Ana SantosDue 08.12.202630%
System FMEA started. FTA for the loss of steering assist top event waits on the supplier failure rates.
HSI SpecificationNot started4 6.5.4Owner: Ana SantosDue 15.12.20260%
Blocked until the microcontroller variant is fixed.
Hardware and softwareSection
HW Safety RequirementsIn progress5 6.5.1Owner: Ana SantosDue 03.12.202635%
Derived from the technical safety concept. Metric targets set at SPFM 99% and LFM 90% for the ASIL D element.
HW Safety AnalysisNot started5 7.5.2Owner: Ana SantosDue 29.12.20260%
FMEDA scheduled once the schematic reaches sample B.
SW Safety RequirementsIn progress6 6.5.1Owner: Sofia BrandtDue 01.12.202645%
SW DFA ReportNot started6 7.5.3Owner: Sofia BrandtDue 05.01.20270%
Safety case report
A printable report of the whole safety case: the GSN argument as a diagram, then every work product by lifecycle section with its status, ISO 26262 clause, owner, due date, notes and the link into your own tools. It is generated from the live tracker, so it is never out of date when the assessor asks for it.
You can
Print it or export it for an assessment or a gate review
Download the argument as SVG or PNG
Hand over one document instead of a folder of spreadsheets
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
TemplatesWork-product templates, exported with your branding as PDF, Word, Excel or XML.
TemplatesAbout this tab
Branded work-product exports in five formats, plus editable copies owned by your organization.
Read more
Branding
Header and footer details stamped on every exported template.
Footer noteConfidential. Controlled copy only when printed from the Acme document system.
Save branding
Search name, description, tag or ISO rePart 5All phasesAll tagsInclude examplesInclude descriptions
20 / pageCardsList
Showing 1-15 of 15 matching, 234 in the catalog
Clear filters
2 selected
Exported as one ZIP in the chosen format.
Select all filteredClear selection
WordDownload bundle (2)
Analysis of Effectiveness of Hardware Architecture
SPFM and LFM evaluation of the hardware architecture against random hardware failure targets (ISO 26262-5 Clause 8)
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentexpertv1.0.211 chapters
ISO references & tags(18)
Pin this version
PDFViewExport
Analysis of Safety Goal Violations Due to Random Hardware Failures
ISO 26262-5:2018 §9.5.1 - Analysis of safety goal violations due to random hardware failures (PMHF or EEC)
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentexpertv1.0.310 chapters
ISO references & tags(14)
Pinned v1.0.3 as of 14.10.2026
PDFViewExport
FMEDA Worksheet (Board-level)
Quantitative HW FMEDA with SPFM / LFM / PMHF per ISO 26262-5:2018 Clauses 8-9 and Annex E
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentexpertv1.0.09 chapters
ISO references & tags(12)
Pin this version
PDFViewExport
Hardware Architecture Metrics Verification Report
ISO 26262-5:2018 §8.5.2 - Verification review report of the analysis of the effectiveness of the architecture (SPFM / LFM)
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentadvancedv1.0.38 chapters
ISO references & tags(13)
Pin this version
PDFViewExport
Hardware Design Specification
ISO 26262-5:7.5.1 detailed hardware design including safety mechanisms
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentcomplexv1.0.212 chapters
ISO references & tags(34)
Pin this version
PDFViewExport
Hardware Safety Analysis Report
ISO 26262-5 Clauses 7/8/9: safety analysis (FMEDA/FTA), architectural metrics (SPFM/LFM), and PMHF/EEC evaluation
Select
Part 5Hardware Developmentexpertv1.0.213 chapters
ISO references & tags(39)
Pinned v1.0.2 as of 02.10.2026
PDFViewExport
Branded work-product templates
The catalog of 234 ISO 26262 work-product templates, filterable by part, phase and tag, each exported as PDF, Word, Excel, JSON or XML with your legal name, logo, contact line and footer note stamped on it. Pin a version and every later export reproduces exactly that baseline.
You can
Export one template or a bundle of up to 40 as a ZIP
Stamp your company identity on every exported document
Pin a template version so audits always see the same baseline
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
My TemplatesYour editable copies of work-product templates, exported with your branding.
TemplatesAbout this tab
Branded work-product exports in five formats, plus editable copies owned by your organization.
Read more
Search name, source template or project...All projects
Confirmation Measure Report (Acme Safety Systems)
From: Confirmation Measure Report
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)Part 2Management10 chapters
Last edited 03.11.2026
Edit
WordExport
Item Definition (EPS)
From: Item Definition
Electric Power Steering (ASIL D)Part 3Concept9 chapters
Editable copies of any catalog template that belong to your organization: rename them, rewrite the chapters for your process, file them under a project and export them with your branding. Duplicate a copy for the next project instead of starting again.
You can
Turn a catalog template into your own controlled version
File each copy under the project it belongs to
Duplicate a finished copy as the start of the next project
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Workshop packs and checklistsFacilitator packs and review checklists, stamped with your organization's name.
All packs
PacksAbout this tab
Download academy workshop packs and checklists, or create, copy and upload your organization's own.
Read more
Your organization's packs
Internal Gate Review Checklist (our process)
Written in the pack builder by this organisation: the internal safety gate questions asked at every milestone, alongside the academy catalog.
Yoursconfirmation review3 sections9 KB
Download PDFEdit
EPS Supplier DIA Checklist
Our development interface agreement checklist for the steering sensor supplier, uploaded as the controlled PDF.
Yoursdia review412 KB
Download PDFEdit detailsReplace PDF
HARA Workshop Pack (BMS edition)
Our copy of the academy HARA pack, rewritten for the battery pack: thermal runaway and overcharge scenarios, our S/E/C anchors.
Facilitator kit for a two-day hazard analysis and risk assessment: preparation checklist, timed agenda, S/E/C calibration anchors, a fully worked hazard analysis for a fictional steering program, and blank worksheets for your own item.
hazard-analysis-risk-assessment7 sections33 KB
Download PDFStart from this one
System FMEA Facilitation Pack
Facilitation kit for a system FMEA: preparation checklist, session agenda, structure and failure analysis worksheets, severity / occurrence / detection anchors with action priority, a worked example on a fictional steering ECU, and an action tracking sheet.
fmea7 sections24 KB
Download PDFStart from this one
Technical Safety Concept Workshop Pack
Working-session kit for deriving the technical safety concept from the functional safety concept: requirement derivation, safety mechanism selection, a fully worked fault-reaction timing budget, ASIL decomposition rules, and hardware-software interface worksheets.
technical-safety-concept6 sections23 KB
Download PDFStart from this one
Workshop packs and checklists
Ready-to-run facilitator packs for HARA, FMEA and technical safety concept workshops, plus confirmation review and assessment checklists, every PDF stamped with your organization name. Copy any academy pack and rewrite it for your own process, build one from scratch, or upload the checklist you already use.
You can
Run a two-day HARA or FMEA workshop from a finished pack
Copy an academy pack and adapt it to your process
Keep your own checklists next to the academy catalog
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
OnboardingOnboarding plans per new hire: milestones, slippage alerts, probation report.
OnboardingAbout this tab
Calendar-anchored onboarding plans per new hire, with day-offset milestones and a one-click probation report.
Read more
New onboarding plan
TemplateProject Manager Safety Onboarding
MemberSofia Brandt
Start date (UTC)16.11.2026
Create planCancel
activestarted 10.10.2026, next due 24.11.2026
Ana Santos: New Safety Engineer 90-Day Onboarding
1/3 milestones
canceledstarted 06.10.2026
Radu Dinu: Safety Viewer 30-Day Orientation
1/3 milestones
completedstarted 12.03.2025
Daniel Okafor: Functional Safety Manager Onboarding
4/4 milestones
completedstarted 02.06.2026
Lena Chen: New Safety Engineer 90-Day Onboarding
3/3 milestones
Onboarding plans
Every new hire gets a plan built from your onboarding template: milestones as day offsets from the start date, so the dates follow the person. Milestones tick off from real activity, a curriculum completed or an exam passed, and a slipped milestone is flagged before the probation review.
You can
Start a plan for a new hire from a reusable template
See at a glance whose onboarding is slipping
Reuse one template for every hire in the same role
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Ana Santos: New Safety Engineer 90-Day OnboardingStarted 10.10.2026. 1/3 milestones done.
OnboardingAbout this tab
Calendar-anchored onboarding plans per new hire, with day-offset milestones and a one-click probation report.
Read more
All plans
active
Complete curriculum: Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials
Curriculum
due 31.10.2026 | completed 29.10.2026 (manual sign-off)
Fundamentals review with mentor
Checkpoint
due 24.11.2026
Sign off
First project contribution signed off
Checkpoint
due 08.01.2027
Sign off
Onboarding plan and probation report
One new hire's plan as a timeline: curriculum, exam and checkpoint milestones with their due dates, completed automatically from the platform or signed off by the manager. At the end of probation the whole plan exports as a PDF or CSV report for HR.
You can
Sign off a mentor checkpoint the day it happens
Override a milestone when the evidence lives elsewhere
Export the probation report as PDF or CSV
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Expert DeskShared answers, your internal review queue, and your monthly hour pool.
2Pool hours / month
1.25Hours remaining
72hEscalation window
01.11.2026Period start
Expert DeskAbout this tab
Answered questions shared with the team, an internal review queue for your own experts, and your monthly hour pool.
Read more
Internal review window (hours before auto-escalation)72
Save window
Questions routed to your internal experts escalate to the academy desk automatically when the window elapses without a resolution. Designate experts from the Members page.
LibraryInternal queueMy questions
completedsharedTomás Novak
Can we decompose ASIL D into ASIL B(D) + ASIL B(D) when both channels share one supply?
Only with the common supply covered as a dependent failure: show freedom from interference for the shared regulator (DFA per Part 9, Clause 7) and an independent monitor of it. Without that evidence the decomposition does not hold and both channels stay ASIL D.
How do we argue freedom from interference for our mixed-ASIL ECU?
Resolve internallyEscalate to the academy desk
answer readyescalated to the desksharedLena Chen
Is a back-to-back test between model and code enough for the unit verification of generated code?
It is one of the unit verification methods Part 6 lists for model-based development. For ASIL C and D you still need structural coverage on the generated code and confidence in the code generator, from tool qualification per Part 8, Clause 11 or from verifying its output.
completedsharedRavi Iyer
Which tool confidence level does our static analyser need if its results replace manual code review?
If it replaces a verification step, a tool error can go unnoticed, so TI2. With medium or low detection confidence that gives TCL2 or TCL3; pick the qualification methods from Part 8, Table 5 (TCL2) or Table 4 (TCL3) for your ASIL.
Expert Desk
Your engineers ask ISO 26262 questions in the workspace. A question can go to your own internal experts first and escalates to the academy desk when your review window runs out, drawing on the monthly hour pool in your plan. Answers shared with the team build a searchable library of decisions.
You can
Route questions to your own experts before the academy
Set how long the internal review may take
Build a shared library of answered questions
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Manager ReportsCohort completion, overdue assignments and per-member activity.
10Members
50%Completion
1Overdue
2Not started
ReportsAbout this tab
Cohort completion, overdue assignments and per-member training records, exportable as CSV or PDF.
Read more
All members
By curriculum
Curriculum
Assigned
Completed
Overdue
Avg progress
Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials
10
6
1
64%
Acme Safety Systems Safety Analysis Expert Track
2
0
0
21%
By member
Members
Cumulative to 03.11.2026, covering every active assignment (earliest assigned 02.09.2026). Names link to each member's training transcript.
Member
Role
Assigned
Completed
Overdue
Last activity
Evaluation & training record
Ana Santos
Hardware Safety Engineer
2
0
0
02.11.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Daniel Okafor
Functional Safety Manager
1
1
0
31.10.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Jonas Wagner
Safety Engineer
1
1
0
01.11.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Lena Chen
Verification Engineer
1
1
0
30.10.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Mara Keller
Functional Safety Manager
1
1
0
03.11.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Petra Lindner
No role assigned
1
0
0
No activity
EvaluationPDFCSV
Radu Dinu
No role assigned
1
0
1
No activity
EvaluationPDFCSV
Ravi Iyer
Software Safety Engineer
1
1
0
01.11.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Sofia Brandt
Project Manager
1
0
0
30.10.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Tomás Novak
Safety Analysis Expert
2
1
0
31.10.2026
EvaluationPDFCSV
Manager reports
Completion per curriculum and per engineer, overdue assignments and last activity in one report, with every engineer's training record a click away as a PDF or CSV. A scheduled training report pack can go out by email to owners and admins every month or quarter.
You can
Export the competence register as CSV or PDF
Download any engineer's training record for an audit
Open exam integrity and question analytics from the header
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Exam integrityAdvisory signals on completed attempts. Conversation starters, not verdicts.
ReportsAbout this tab
Cohort completion, overdue assignments and per-member training records, exportable as CSV or PDF.
Read more
These signals are advisory indicators derived from timing and telemetry patterns. They are not proof of misconduct. Use them as a starting point for a conversation with the learner, and consider legitimate explanations such as prior subject expertise, connectivity issues, accessibility tooling, or retaking a familiar exam.
All examsSearch members...Generated 03.11.2026, 19:26:34
Member
Exam
Date
Score
Signals
Advisory
Ana Santos
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
28.10.2026
68%not passed
None
No flags
Tomás Novak
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
27.10.2026
82.6%passed
None
No flags
Lena Chen
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
25.10.2026
78.3%not passed
None
No flags
Jonas Wagner
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
25.10.2026
69.6%not passed
Frequent window/tab switching
Signals noted
Ravi Iyer
Software Safety Requirements Quiz
22.10.2026
94%passed
Rapid correct answersVery fast overall pace
Review suggested
Daniel Okafor
Annual Functional Safety Refresher
21.10.2026
88%passed
No browser telemetry recorded
No flags
Sofia Brandt
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
18.10.2026
69.6%not passed
None
No flags
Ana Santos
Safety Analyses: FMEA, FTA and DFA
14.10.2026
61%not passed
None
No flags
Mara Keller
Annual Functional Safety Refresher
12.10.2026
88%passed
None
No flags
Ravi Iyer
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
10.10.2026
91.3%passed
None
No flags
Exam integrity
Every completed exam attempt with advisory signals from timing and browser telemetry: answers faster than reading time, a very fast overall pace, frequent tab switching or no telemetry at all. The page states plainly that a signal is a reason to talk to the engineer, not proof of anything.
You can
Filter attempts by exam or search a member
See which signal fired and why, per attempt
Switch the whole workspace to aggregate-only reporting
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Question AnalyticsWhere the team loses points: per-question fail rates and the weakest topics.
190Graded responses
10Questions with data
0Suppressed
5 / 3Min sample (att/mem)
ReportsAbout this tab
Cohort completion, overdue assignments and per-member training records, exportable as CSV or PDF.
Read more
Weakest topics
ISO 26262 Part 3 - Concept Phase58%19 attempts, 1 q
Agile & Process Adaptation42%19 attempts, 1 q
E-Gas Monitoring Concept37%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 10 - Guidelines37%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 6 - Software Level32%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 2 - Safety Management21%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 4 - System Level16%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 7 - Production & Operation11%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 5 - Hardware Level5%19 attempts, 1 q
ISO 26262 Part 8 - Supporting Processes0%19 attempts, 1 q
Questions by failure rate
Highest fail rate
Question
Fail rate
Attempts
Members
Avg time
Which records must the verification of a hazard analysis and risk assessment produce before the safety goals are...
ISO 26262 Part 3 - Concept PhaseADVANCEDharasafety-goalverification
58%
19
8
171s
An ASIL C function is developed by agile teams at three sites. Which agreement settles who owns the safety...
Agile & Process AdaptationADVANCEDdistributed-developmentdevelopment-interface-agreement
42%
19
8
160s
In a three-level monitoring concept, what does the second level check, and on which hardware does it...
A hardware fault violates a safety goal on its own and no safety mechanism covers it. How is it...
ISO 26262 Part 10 - GuidelinesINTERMEDIATEfault-classificationsingle-point-fault
37%
19
8
164s
Question analytics
Where your team loses points: the weakest topics ranked by fail rate, then every question with its fail rate, attempts, members and average answer time. Groups smaller than your minimum sample are withheld, so a fail rate never points at a single engineer.
You can
Find the topic to cover in the next team session
Sort questions by fail rate, attempts or time
Rely on minimum sample sizes that protect individuals
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Ana SantosHardware Safety Engineer - [email protected] - since 12.05.2025
Competence profile
Certificates
Downloading the PDF stamps the certificate's content hash and signs it with the platform's certificate signing key. Anyone can then check the signature against the public key published at the Verify link, without an account.
Hardware Metrics: SPFM, LFM and PMHF
ISO-7F3A-91C2-4E8B
Issued 22.07.2026
Content version: qrev:4b19c0de@2026-07-01
VerifyDownload PDF
Functional Safety Foundations
ISO-2C81-0D5E-9A17
Issued 14.05.2025
Content version: qrev:e81d4a27@2025-04-22
VerifyDownload PDF
Exam history
Exam
Date
Score
Result
Content version
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
28.10.2026
68%
failed
Content version: qrev:a3f09c12@2026-10-02
Safety Analyses: FMEA, FTA and DFA
14.10.2026
61%
failed
Content version: qrev:5d7e21b4@2026-09-18
Hardware Metrics: SPFM, LFM and PMHF
22.07.2026
84%
passed
Content version: qrev:4b19c0de@2026-07-01
Functional Safety Foundations
14.05.2025
79%
passed
Content version: qrev:e81d4a27@2025-04-22
Simulator evidence
Simulator
Completed
Evidence hash
Assignment due
FMEDA Simulator
19.10.2026
9c41e07ab2d35f18...
30.10.2026
FTA Simulator
02.09.2026
1e6bd0c4f9a27e53...
-
Curricula
Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials
29%
Content version: steps:1f1f4b88@2026-09-02
Acme Safety Systems Safety Analysis Expert Track
14%
Content version: steps:bc1cc685@2026-10-20
Training record
One engineer's training record as an assessor wants to see it: signed certificates anyone can verify without an account, every exam attempt with score, result and the exact content version assessed, simulator evidence with its hash and curriculum progress. It downloads as a branded PDF or CSV at any time.
You can
Hand an assessor a verifiable record per engineer
Prove which version of the content each exam assessed
Export the record as PDF or CSV in one click
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Ana Santos - evaluation[email protected] - readiness, strengths and next steps from their exams.
Correct rate per question category (top by volume)
Score timeline
Completed attempts over time vs pass mark
Engineer evaluation
A readiness score per engineer computed from the exams they take for your team, broken down into recent performance, difficulty-adjusted mastery, topic coverage, trend, consistency and completion discipline. Below it: standing in the team, mastery per category, the score over time against the pass mark and rule-based suggestions on what to study next.
You can
See how ready an engineer is before an assessment
Find the categories that pull their score down
Export the evaluation as an image for a one-to-one
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
BillingManage your organization's subscription, seats, invoices and billing details.
8Seats
YearlyBilling cycle
06.11.2026Renews on
NoCancels at period end
BillingAbout this tab
Subscription, seat count, billing cycle, invoices and the billing identity used on them.
Read more
Subscription
active8 seats purchased in your plan
Seats
8seats purchased in your plan
Contract minimum: 5 seatsIn use: 8In use = active members plus open invitations.
Seat changes for your organization are handled by your account manager - contact support to change your seat allocation.
Quotes & purchase orders
Order against a purchase order and pay by invoice instead of by card.
Request a quote
Q-2026-1042requested - awaiting your quotation
10 seats, billed annually
Price to be confirmed
net 30 days (requested)
Two more seats for the BMS team from January, on the same contract and renewal date.
Seats, billing cycle and renewal date at the top, the contract minimum and the seats in use underneath. Buy more seats against a purchase order and pay by invoice instead of by card, and reconcile who holds a seat and who may see billing.
You can
Request a quote and order against your own PO number
See seats in use against your contract at any time
Give billing access only to the people who need it
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Organization settingsProfile, branding, LMS integrations, API access and ownership.
Your organization profile as it appears across the Teams workspace.
Name
Acme Safety Systems
Slug
acme-safety
Status
Active
Created
12.03.2025
Company details
Your legal company identity - legal name, registered address and VAT number - as it appears on exported work products, safety-case reports and invoices.
These details are injected into every branded document your team exports and onto billing invoices. Edit them in the places below.
Billing and company identity: legal name, registered address and VAT number. Requires the billing permission.
Template branding: per-document overrides (contact line, footer note, whether the logo is shown) used when rendering work products.
Date & time format, timezone
Used everywhere on your organization pages - dashboards, statistics, deadlines, audit trail. Defaults: German date format with seconds, Berlin time.
Date formatDD.MM.YYYY (e.g. 03.11.2026)
Time format24-hour with seconds (14:30:05)
TimezoneEurope/Berlin
Save localization
Live preview: 03.11.2026, 19:27:55 (Europe/Berlin)
Communication & guidance
Organization-wide defaults for every member. Transactional emails (invitations, security, billing) are always delivered.
Allow ISO 26262 Academy marketing emails to members
Unchecked: newsletters and product campaigns are suppressed for every member of this organization, regardless of their personal setting.
Organization settings
The workspace profile, the legal identity stamped on every exported document and invoice, and the date, time and timezone format used on every page, from deadlines to the audit trail. Further down: marketing email suppression, who may read the audit trail, your logo and brand colour.
You can
Set your locale once for every page and export
Suppress marketing email for the whole team
Put your logo and brand colour on the workspace
LMS integration (LTI 1.3 and xAPI)
Launch your exams from inside your LMS (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L), pass grades back, and stream xAPI statements to your LRS. Give your LMS admin the tool URLs below.
Public JWKS for this platform (set it as the tool's public keyset URL in your LMS): https://iso26262.academy/api/lti/platforms/5d2e9a4c-17b0-4c8e-9e61-0a3f7c2b8d14/jwks
Exams launch from inside your own LMS over LTI 1.3 (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L) and grades flow back to its gradebook, while xAPI statements stream to your learning record store. Delivery health shows what was delivered, what is pending and what failed.
You can
Register your LMS and launch exams from it
Stream xAPI statements to your own LRS
Watch grade passback and xAPI delivery at a glance
Analytics privacy
Who may be named in a team report, and how far back behavioural data is reported on. Enforced server-side on every analytics surface, not just hidden in this interface.
Aggregate-only reporting
Suppresses per-person rows, names and identifiers across every analytics surface - team statistics, the organization overview, manager reports, competence and exam integrity alike. The suppression happens on the server, so it applies to exports and API reads too, not only to what this interface draws.
Minimum cohort size5
Between 2 and 500 (default 5). A group smaller than this has its aggregate withheld as well, because an average over two people is a named individual with extra steps.
Retention window (days)730
Between 30 and 3650 days. How far back BEHAVIOURAL and engagement telemetry may be reported on - reading time, watch time, activity dates. It never applies to competence records or training evidence, which an assessor may ask for at any time.
Save privacy settings
Transfer ownership
Hand the owner seat to another active member. There is always exactly one owner; you keep admin access after the transfer.
Danger zone
New owner
Select a member...Transfer ownership
API access
Create key
Read-only integration keys for your HR or LMS systems. A key reads competence, transcripts, cohort reports, the roster and curriculum assignments for this organization only, and only the scopes you tick when you create it.
How your systems call the API
Send the key on every request as Authorization: Bearer orgk_... against these read-only endpoints:
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/competenceneedscompetence:read
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/competence/{user_id}needscompetence:read
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/transcripts/{user_id}needstranscripts:read
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/reports/cohortneedsreports:read
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/membersneedsmembership:read
GET /api/integrations/org/v1/assignmentsneedsassignments:read
Name
Key
Scopes
Created
Expires
Last used
Status
HR system (read only)
orgk_LT1Ny-H...
competence:readtranscripts:readreports:read
13.10.2026
13.10.2027
03.11.2026, 10:00:34
active
Revoke
Moodle roster sync
orgk_9bQe2-W...
membership:readassignments:read
21.10.2026
21.10.2027
03.11.2026, 06:00:12
active
Revoke
LMS pilot key
orgk_3pDzcKK...
competence:readtranscripts:readreports:read
24.09.2026
24.09.2027
09.10.2026, 20:00:34
revoked
Analytics privacy and API keys
Privacy rules your works council can sign off: switch the workspace to aggregate-only reporting, set the minimum cohort below which averages are withheld and how far back behavioural data may be reported, all enforced on the server. Read-only API keys feed competence, transcripts, cohort reports and the roster to your HR system or LMS.
You can
Report in aggregate only, enforced on the server
Create scoped, expiring read-only API keys
Revoke a key and see when each key was last used
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsOwner
Activity and audit trailA tamper-evident record of who did what in your organization, and when.
AuditAbout this tab
A tamper-evident record of every administrative action in the organization: who did what, to what, and when.
Every administrative action in the workspace, from a role change or a new API key to a safety case review decision: who did it, with which role, on what, and when, with the full details one click away. Filter by area, search it, and export it as CSV or JSON for your own records.
You can
Answer "who changed this, and when" in seconds
Export the trail as CSV or JSON for an audit
Let admins read it too, or keep it owner-only
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsMember
My learningYour activity and assignments at Acme Safety Systems.
4h 12mConcept read time
38mVideo watch time
14Concepts viewed
3Open assignments
My LearningAbout this tab
Your own seat: assigned exams and deadlines, assigned reading, learning time and the concepts you have opened.
Read more
Assigned exams & deadlines
View all
Search assignments...All statuses3 of 3
ISO 26262 Fundamentals - Team Qualification
Due 17.11.2026
AssignedStart
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check
Due 24.11.2026 . Best 68
In progressContinue
Annual Functional Safety Refresher
Due 30.11.2026
AssignedStart
Time split
Concept readVideo watch
Assigned reading
Actuator Safety
Due 06.11.2026 . 70% read
Read
AI Component or System Architecture (Refined)
Due 06.11.2026
Open
Hardware Architectural Metrics Report
Due 04.12.2026
Open
Dependent Failure Analysis (DFA)
Due 18.12.2026
Read
Concepts
Browse the Knowledge Hub
Hardware Architectural Metrics
Last viewed 02.11.2026
41m
FMEDA
Last viewed 02.11.2026
35m
Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment (HARA)
Last viewed 28.10.2026
32m
Safety Mechanisms
Last viewed 27.10.2026
24m
My Learning
What each engineer sees on their own seat: the exams the team assigned them with their deadlines and best score so far, the reading assigned to them, the split between reading and video time, and the concepts they opened last. Nothing to configure; it is the same workspace, seen from the seat.
You can
Start or continue an assigned exam in one click
See every deadline and the best score so far
Pick up the assigned reading where it stopped
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsMember
My learning pathThe programme your organization assigned you as Hardware Safety Engineer.
2Paths assigned
2In progress
3/14Steps done
My PathAbout this tab
The learning path your organization assigned you, step by step, with your own progress and a link into each step.
Read more
Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials
In progressEveryone in the team
Part 2 and Part 8 duties for the safety manager: planning, confirmation measures, distributed development (DIA/SEooC), change control and the lifecycle beyond development.
Written for: Functional Safety ManagerAssigned by Mara KellerAssigned 02.09.2026Due 06.11.2026
29%
2 of 7 steps
Next up: Development Interface Agreementabout 2h 40m left on this pathRead now
1.Safety Plan Development
Concept pageabout 35 min
2.Confirmation Measures
Concept pageabout 20 min
3.Development Interface Agreement
Concept pageabout 30 min
Read
4.Safety Element out of Context (SEooC)
Concept pageabout 25 min
Read
5.Change Impact Analysis for Carryover and Modified Systems
Concept pageabout 30 min
Read
6.Production, Operation, Service and Decommissioning
Concept pageabout 30 min
Read
7.ISO 26262 vs Other Safety Standards
Concept pageabout 45 min
Read
My Path
The learning path the team assigned the engineer, step by step: progress, the due date, the next step to take and the time left on the path. Steps tick off from the engineer's own activity, a concept completed or an exam passed, never from a self-reported checkbox.
You can
Follow the assigned path in the right order
See the next step and the time left at a glance
Trust a progress figure that comes from real activity
🏢
Acme Safety SystemsMember
My training recordYour training record here as Hardware Safety Engineer. Yours to download any time.
2Certificates
4Exams recorded
2Paths
1Open gaps
My RecordAbout this tab
Your own training record: certificates, exam history, path completion and your competence profile, downloadable at any time.
Read more
My competence profile
Safety Management
Part 2
-
No evidence yet.
Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment
Part 3ASIL
68%
Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check68%28.10.2026
Functional Safety Concept
Part 3ASIL
-
No evidence yet.
Technical Safety Concept & System
Part 4ASIL
-
Your role asks for developing here. Closing this is what moves the number.
No evidence yet.
Hardware Design & Metrics
Part 5ASIL
84%
Hardware Metrics: SPFM, LFM and PMHF22.07.2026Hardware Metrics: SPFM, LFM and PMHF84%22.07.2026
Software Development
Part 6ASIL
-
No evidence yet.
Safety Analyses
Part 9ASIL
71%
Safety Analyses: FMEA, FTA and DFA61%14.10.2026Hazard Analysis and ASIL Determination Check68%28.10.2026
StrongDevelopingGapNo signalExpiring within 6 months
Assigned paths
Acme Safety Systems Functional Safety Manager Essentials29%
Content version: steps:1f1f4b88@2026-09-02
Acme Safety Systems Safety Analysis Expert Track14%
Content version: steps:bc1cc685@2026-10-20
My Record
The engineer's own training record, the same one the manager sees: competence per ISO 26262 area against what their role requires, with the exams and certificates behind each level, assigned paths, certificates and exam history. It downloads as PDF or CSV at any time, so a record follows the person.
You can
See which area the role still needs evidence in
Check the exams and certificates behind each level
Download the whole record as PDF or CSV
Illustrative · sample data
One rate per seat, on an annual contract. Bigger team, deeper discount.
Every seat carries the full Expert plan: all content, simulators, and adaptive and thematic exams, plus every team feature. Band discounts are taken off the full Expert monthly price of $83.32/mo, the reference price on our pricing page. Minimum one year term, and every seat rate below is net: VAT excluded.
BandTeam sizePer seat / monthVolume discountYou save
S 1
Individual1 engineer, the Expert plan as is, monthly, no contract
$83.32$74.99PER MONTH, FINAL PRICE
·bands discount from $83.32
S 10
Small team2 to 10 seats · 1 year contract
↓$66.66PER SEAT / MO, EXCL. VAT
20% off list$999 a year less than 10 individual plans
S 20
DepartmentMost chosen11 to 30 seats · 1 year contract
↓$58.32PER SEAT / MO, EXCL. VAT
30% off list$6,001 a year less than 30 individual plans
S 30
Organization31 to 50 seats · 1 year contract
↓$49.99PER SEAT / MO, EXCL. VAT
40% off list$15,000 a year less than 50 individual plans
S 40
EnterpriseAbove 50 seats · custom terms, currency and invoicing
↓$49.99AND LOWER, PER SEAT / MO, EXCL. VAT
40%+ off listnegotiated per organization
More seatsLower per seat price ↓
What 30 seats look like over one year
Same 30 engineers, same goal, different way to buy. Individual plans at their final price; seat rates net, with VAT added on the invoice where it applies.
One time external training€2,500 average per person, once (EUR market reference)
€75,000one time
30 individual plans$74.99 each per month, monthly plan
$26,996per year
Department band S 20$58.32 per seat per month
$20,995per year
✓ Same 30 engineers on the Teams plan: $20,995 per year on band S 20 instead of $26,996 on 30 individual plans. You keep $6,001, and the seats work all year.
Every seat includes
Full Expert content catalog: all ISO 26262 concepts, work products and templates, simulators and processes
Unlimited random, adaptive and thematic practice exams, with a recorded result on every attempt
Assigned exams with due dates, plus personal self paced learning
Team dashboard visibility for admins and audit logged administration
Seat reassignment: swap an engineer out, the seat keeps working
Archived members can be reactivated at any time, with their progress, scores and evidence intact
Contract facts
All team rates are net prices: VAT is NOT included and is added on the invoice per your country and legal entity
Minimum term one year, billed annually in one consolidated invoice
Seats are reassignable at any time at no cost
Add seats mid term with native proration
Enterprise terms are set per organization at quote time
Enterprise add-on, optional
Company single sign-on and directory sync
Your engineers sign in with your own identity provider, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID or Google Workspace, and SCIM directory sync grants and removes access straight from your directory. Seats stay company owned and invite governed: your directory decides who holds one, so you never carry a seat you did not grant.
$3,600
per organization / year USD, net, VAT excludedCovers SSO and SCIM · configured at onboarding
For larger rollouts
What training leads, procurement and IT usually want to know before a company wide rollout. Pick a topic.
How a team subscription pays for itself
A course is consumed once; a competence program runs for years. Teams is the second: company owned seats, accumulating evidence, and demand the standard keeps alive.
Periodic training and capability evaluation is how this industry already works.
Automotive suppliers that work to the standard already train engineers and evaluate team capability on a cycle. The platform carries that cadence.
AssignSeat given to an engineer
AssessLearn, practice, pass exams
ArchiveEvidence kept for audits
ReassignSame seat, next engineer
One seat, many engineers: 15 seats can carry 40+ engineers through the programme in a year, on one consolidated invoice per year.
The standard makes it recurring
Part 2 of the standard expects documented competence management. Every result and action becomes competence evidence for assessors and OEMs, year after year. An obligation, not a one time course.
Seats are floating, not personal
The seat belongs to the company. Once an engineer has completed the programme, the admin hands it to the next hire. You train a pipeline, not a fixed list of names.
Training never actually ends
New hires, ramp ups, role changes, refreshers and standard updates keep demand steady. Treated as a program, safety competence is budgeted annually, like a tool license.
Used during projects, not just before them
Templates, work products and the FTA, FMEA, FMEDA and GSN safety case simulators are opened mid project, next to the real safety case. A daily reference, not just a classroom.
Five scoped roles, no platform admin required
Roles live on the membership, not the account. One person can be owner in one org, member in another; team roles never reach platform privileges.
Full controlowner
Full control: roles, billing, ownership transfer, organization settings.
Team opsadmin
Manages members and invitations, assigns exams, reads team analytics.
Billing onlybilling_admin
Seats, billing cycle, invoices and payment details, nothing else.
Learnermember
A learner. Full Expert tier access and assigned exams inside the team.
Read onlyviewer
Read only visibility for stakeholders: training progress without a learning seat.
All thirty seven team features, in the seat price
Arranged by what your company actually needs from them.
Prove competence
You open the matrix and export, instead of assembling binders
Competence matrixEvidence backed, per engineer and topic: on track, refresh due, gap found
Training records and certificatesPer member, with a full transcript export
Team analyticsPass rate, average score and attempts
Scheduled manager reportsProgress, gaps and overdue work, sent to the inboxes you choose
Exam integrity signalsOn every attempt, for example an answer burst flagged for review
Question analyticsItem level: the question the team keeps missing, and the refresher to assign
Seat sharing analyticsRight size your seats before renewal
Stay current
Assign once; reminders and refreshers run themselves
Full Expert catalogConcepts, templates, simulators, exams and processes on every seat
Exam assignment with due dates
Automated reminders
Recurring refreshersRepeats yearly and schedules itself
Role based curricula
Assigned courseworkTracked to completion
Ramp new hires
A plan exists before the laptop arrives
Placement examsDay one: skips what they already know
Onboarding plans
Mentor pairing
Probation reportsAuto drafted for the manager
Expert deskInternal routing of questions to your seniors
Track the safety case New
The tracker you work in is the artefact you show
Safety Case Tracker
73 entry ISO 26262 catalogParts 3 to 7, built by drag and drop
Live links to work products
Completeness rollups
Access grantsAudit logged, for example view only access for an external assessor
Project tags and annotationsOnly your organization sees them
Pinned versions and digests
Keep control
Governed from a browser; nothing waits for our support
Five scoped roles
Invitations and CSV importEmail bound and expiring, with a dry run
Seat billing and prorationOne invoice, 72 hour payment grace, no team lockout
Append only audit logTamper resistant: every admin action is logged
Tenant isolationFail closed, applied at the query layer on every read
Per tab org contextOrganization and personal work never mix
Fit your stack
It plugs in, reports back and wears your logo
Org exam builderYour own question bank
Question import via CSV
Branded templates
Workshop packsHandouts and checklists for internal trainings
LTI 1.3 for your LMSGrades flow back
xAPI export and org API keys
External training happens once per person. This runs all year.
A seminar teaches a snapshot to a fixed list, then everyone goes home. Teams keeps teaching, keeps proving, keeps every seat working for the next engineer.
What the team still knows, month by month
One time 3 day seminarTeams plan
Month 036912
Illustrative, not measured data.
The traditional route
One time external seminar
3 days
of training, once per engineer
EUR 1,500 to 2,500 per engineer for a 3 day course, plus travel and days out of the project (market reference, quoted in euro)
Knowledge fades within months; nothing to go back to once it ends
A certificate PDF and nothing else: no ongoing evidence trail for assessors
Every new hire waits for the next seminar date, often months away
Fixed agenda: the same slides for the intern and the safety manager
The Teams plan
A platform your team lives in
365 days
of learning, practice and evidence, every year
$699.84 per seat per year on the Department band S 20, 11-30 seats ($58.32 per seat per month, net, VAT excluded), reassignable across engineers
Always available: every concept, template and exam can be revisited without limit, whenever a project demands it
Learning plus daily practice: simulators, templates and work products, all year
Exams, scores and the audit log accumulate into competence evidence per engineer
New hires onboard the day they join, on a seat you already own
Assignments target exactly what each role needs, when it is needed
Runs inside the LMS you already have
If your training already lives in a learning management system, the Academy plugs into it as an LTI 1.3 tool. An instructor picks an Academy exam from inside a course, the learner launches it without a second login, the score is posted back to your gradebook, and the activity trail streams to your own LRS over xAPI. Your organization owner configures all of it from the workspace; there is no ticket to raise with us.
What is wired
LTI 1.3 launch
OIDC third-party login and resource-link launch. The learner arrives already signed in, provisioned just in time against a seat in your organization.
Deep linking
The instructor browses your published exams from inside the course and drops one in as a graded activity. No copying links, no shared passwords.
Grades flow back
The final score is posted through Assignment and Grade Services against the line item your LMS created. A resend overwrites the same result rather than adding a second one.
xAPI to your LRS
Launched, answered, completed and retraction statements go to the LRS endpoint you nominate. Statement identifiers are derived, so a redelivery is recognised as the same statement instead of double-counting.
Nothing is dropped
Every grade and every statement is written to a durable delivery queue first, then retried with backoff and parked for inspection if the far end stays down. Owners get a per-organization delivery health readout.
Keys rotate, launches are single use
The tool publishes its own key set with an active and a retiring key, so signing keys roll over without breaking live launches. Each launch is accepted exactly once, so a captured launch cannot be replayed.
How it is set up
Register, yourself
Your organization owner opens workspace settings, reads off the login, launch and key set URLs to hand to your LMS administrator, and enters the issuer, client id, deployment id and the three platform URLs coming back. Every registration and every change is written to your audit log.
Place the exam
Your instructor adds the tool to a course and deep-links the exam. Only exams your organization is entitled to appear in the picker, and only from your own tenant.
Point it at your LRS
Enter the LRS endpoint and its authorization header, then press test connection. The header is encrypted before it is stored and is never readable back out, not even by you.
Training built on your processes
The catalog covers the standard; your product and process are yours. On top we author custom video modules: your lifecycle, tools and domain, each lesson with slides, delivered only into your workspace.
What is delivered
4K video
Lessons filmed and rendered in crisp 4K resolution
Slides attached
Every video comes with its slide deck attached, publication quality
Platform integrated
Lives in your team workspace: assignable, tracked, audit logged
Offline download
Download the material and use it offline, on the road or in the plant
Subtitled
Every video ships with subtitles for exact, searchable follow along
Brief
We map your processes, gaps and audience with your safety manager, and agree a scoped outline and fixed quote up front.
Author
Our safety experts author the videos in your context, slides attached to every lesson. You approve every draft.
Deploy
The videos go live in your private workspace: gated to your org, invisible to other tenants, tracked in your dashboard.
Fixed, transparent pricing
$1,699
Per hour of finished content · USD, excl. VAT
Scoped and quoted up front; you approve the outline first
You own the material. The finished videos and their slide decks are yours to keep, reuse and adapt, with no licence to renew and no expiry
4K video with subtitles, downloadable for offline use
Every video comes with its slide deck attached
Published only to your organization, isolated like all tenant data
Updated when your process or the standard changes
Net, VAT excluded. A focused module is typically 2 to 4 hours. Most teams start with one alongside their seats.
Engineers who work alongside your team
The platform builds competence; sometimes a project needs hands on the safety work itself. Our functional safety engineers join your team for the parts that carry a deadline: the assessment, the analysis, the metrics, the safety case.
What we help with
Gap assessment
We benchmark your process against the standard and prepare you for the assessor's questions before they are asked.
Analysis facilitation
We run or co-run your HARA, FMEA, FTA and DFA workshops, from item definition through to agreed results.
Hardware metrics
We compute and review your SPFM, LFM and PMHF, and sanity-check the FMEDA behind the numbers.
Safety case and FSA
We build or review your safety case and prepare the argument for the Functional Safety Assessment.
Architecture and ASIL
We work through ASIL decomposition, freedom from interference and safe-architecture trade-offs with your team.
Certification prep
We prepare your engineers for TÜV (FSEP/FSCE) and SGS functional-safety certification exams.
Scope and quote
We map the work with your safety manager, agree the scope and deliverables, and give you a fixed quote up front. You approve before anything starts.
Work alongside you
Remote or on-site, our engineers work inside your V-model, toolchain and ASIL targets, next to your team, not from a distance.
Hand over
You receive the finished deliverables, a walkthrough with the people who will maintain them, and a clear list of what remains.
How it is priced
Engagements are not sold self-serve. There is no rate card and no checkout button for consultancy: every engagement is scoped with your safety manager and fixed-quoted up front, and you approve the quote before we start. Ask through the demo form below or by email and we come back with a scope and a price.
Expert desk hours are a separate, optional pool. Your organization can hold a monthly allowance of expert hours, which we draw against when a question your own seniors cannot close is escalated to us. Your admins see the remaining balance in the workspace. Unused hours do not roll over; the allowance resets each month. Hours are agreed per organization when we set your terms up, so ask for a figure alongside your seat quote.
Mentor pairing is included with your seats at no extra cost. Pairing a junior engineer with one of your own seniors is a workspace feature your admins configure themselves, not a service we sell. The mentor sees exactly one mentee's competence record and nothing else.
You own what we create for you. Assessment reports, tailored templates and analyses produced for your project are yours to keep, reuse and adapt.
The Academy platform and its standard catalog stay licensed to your organization under your seats: used, not sold.
Remote or on-site, aligned to your V-model, toolchain and ASIL targets, and delivered by functional safety practitioners.
Net, VAT excluded. Most teams start with a gap assessment, then scope facilitation, metrics or safety-case work from there. If you want expert desk hours attached to your contract, say so in the message field below and we will price them with your seats.
Need help on one piece of work?
Send a work product, an FMEDA, FTA or DFA, or a technical safety concept to derive from. Functional safety engineers check it or help you do it. Consulting starts from $290, with a written quote before any charge.
The assessor asks for competence evidence. What do we show?
You open the competence matrix and export it, instead of assembling binders. Teams keeps a per-member training record with certificates, team and question-level analytics, and integrity signals on every exam attempt, so evidence is exported rather than reconstructed.
Certifications lapse and nobody has time to chase people. How does Teams handle that?
You assign an exam once with a due date; automated reminders and recurring yearly refreshers run themselves, on top of role-based curricula and tracked assigned coursework.
How fast is a new safety engineer actually productive?
A plan exists before the laptop arrives: a day-one placement exam that skips what they already know, an onboarding plan, mentor pairing, an auto-drafted probation report, and an internal expert desk that routes questions to your seniors.
Where does the project's safety case actually stand?
The Safety Case Tracker is the artefact you show: a 73-entry ISO 26262 catalog built by drag and drop, live links to work products, completeness rollups, audit-logged access grants for external assessors, and pinned versions with change digests.
Will IT, security and procurement sign this off?
It is governed entirely from a browser: five scoped roles, expiring email-bound invitations with CSV import, one prorated annual invoice, an append-only tamper-resistant audit log, and fail-closed tenant isolation applied at the query layer on every read.
We already have an LMS, an LRS and a brand. Does it fit our stack?
It plugs in: LTI 1.3 so grades flow back to your LMS, xAPI export to your LRS, scoped organization API keys, an org exam builder with CSV question import, and branded templates and workshop packs that carry your logo.
How much does a Teams seat cost?
Every seat carries the full Expert plan, priced per seat on an annual contract with volume discounts that deepen as the team grows. The current rates in your currency are in the price table.
Do you offer expert consultancy as well as the platform?
Yes. Our functional safety engineers work alongside your team on gap assessments, HARA/FMEA/FTA/DFA facilitation, hardware metrics (SPFM, LFM, PMHF), safety case and FSA preparation, ASIL decomposition, and TUV/SGS certification preparation. Engagements are scoped and fixed-quoted up front, and the deliverables we create for you are yours to keep. For one document or analysis, consulting starts from $290.
Get a demo workspace
Register with your company email address and we provision a complete demo organization: seats, roles, sample data and every feature on this page, ready to explore.
A working Teams workspace, not a slide deck
We set up a demo organization for you and send the credentials to your inbox. Log in, click around, assign an exam, open the Safety Case Tracker.